David Feuer writes: > The easiest way to keep this working the same as it does now is to > name my new functions filled-polygon and retain the old (really > simple) polygon drawers in the backends.
Hmm. I'd much rather just have a simple dedicated white-triangle function, if we must. > The polygon procedure in lookup.cc can still go away. Ok. > I'm a bit curious, though, why the triangles are done that way, which > lets the blot exceed the normal bounds. If that behavior is a bug, Yes, I guess so. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
