Erik Sandberg schreef:
Use C++ names in C++, and scheme names in scheme, i.e.
Foo_bar::bla_bla
for handling a bla-bla-event.
so do you also think that all stream-event classes should be named
like 'arpeggio-event' rather than 'ArpeggioEvent'?
Regarding bla_bla for classes, it makes me nervous about namespace
clashes. Why not use Foo_bar::bla_bla_event?
maybe
Foo_bar::listen_bla_bla
Isn't there a way to introduce an intermediate list of event types,
just like music has (eg. ArpeggioEvent has a arpeggio-event, which is
the one we're looking for?). It's conceivable that you want to handle
multiple event types (CreateContextEvent, FinishContextEvent) with one
routine.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
LilyPond Software Design
-- Code for Music Notation
http://www.lilypond-design.com
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
