On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 04:37:07PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Ludovic RESLINGER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Yes, I'm on the problem, to solve it, we need guile-1.8 serie.Hi, > > Heikki Junes' email suggests that using 1.8 creates a different > problem; is this not your experience? > > What guile is being used by the upstream developers? The installation > instructions say that only 1.6.7 is needed, IIRC. > > Thomas > Hi,
It would be intesting to test before to do conclusion. In the code whitch is the source of error, there is writing whitch this code need guile-1.7. Someone say that the problem is solved witch 1.8, if you wan more information, you can read this thread : http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2006-06/msg00480.html Actually I haven't tested, because I am on packaging of guile-1.8 in debian. -- .---. Ludovic RESLINGER / \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@./ Trumpet Student in CNR /`\_/`\ Free Software Developer // )X( \\ | \ : )|_ _,'| .''`. /`\_`> <_/ \ @======TTT=====::_ | : :' : \__/'---'\__/ ((_<=HHH___)) `.| `. `'` `---UUU---'=> `-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
