Erik Sandberg escreveu:
hi,
I'm attempting to softcode \accepts and friends. Should the order of \accepts
calls be significant in absence of appropriate \defaultchild? I.e., if we have
\layout {
\context {\Score \accepts "Foo" \accepts "Bar" }
\context {\name Foo \accepts "Baz" }
\context {\name Bar \accepts "Baz" }
}
\new Score \new Baz { c d e }
.. then the path to Baz is ambiguous. Should we ideally throw a warning and
randomly pick either foo or bar, or should the order be defined by the order
of the \accepts calls?
I think it's best to use both: \defaultchild should always have
preference, but in absence, the order is signifcant.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
LilyPond Software Design
-- Code for Music Notation
http://www.lilypond-design.com
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
