Paul Scott wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
This isn't done in printed music. There is some logic in this -- the music doesn't stop after the 2nd time ending -- but to be completely logical the left-most vertical segment of the 1st time ending should also be missing (since music doesn't start at the 1st time repeat).
Perhaps you were sleepy when you wrote this.  :)

I was, actually -- it was 7:32PM local time, so I had just woken up.  :)

The beginning of the first ending is the place where you skip to the second ending the second time and is complete necessary.

Whoops, of course!

Cheers
- Graham


_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to