Graham Percival wrote: > I just rearranged and rewrote part of the tutorial. Since that was my > last task before installing Linux on this macbook, and since "make web" > is currently broken anyway, I committed without testing. Sorry if I > broke anything, but there were special circumstances surrounding this > case which should not apply in the future.
That's small but good work. I have two questions: 1) Do you plan to port such doc improvements back to the stable branch? With git, this is very easily done by "cherry-picking" the concerned commits (with Cogito, the command is 'cg patch -C <commit-checksum>'). If you agree and if you don't want to bother with this, I volunteer to do it (as I already do this with the French docs, that won't bother me). 2) Since LilyPond now warns about every input file without \version, I propose to move docs about \version from "Commenting input files" to "First steps" just after the first example. May I push directly or send a patch first? Regards, -- John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
