Joe Neeman escreveu:
> 
> I have all the page-breaking files with coverage around 90% now, but
> I'll try to improve it a bit more (btw, the reason
> page-turn-page-breaking.cc was so low is that I forgot to put a \book
> around the regression tests so the lilypond-book output skipped the
> page-breaking stuff. Oops).
>  

We have Scheme coverage now as well.  This shows that 

 layout-page-layout.scm.cov
 (define (walk-paths done-lines best-paths current-lines last current-best

isn't covered.  Can you also add a test that runs this old code?  Or should
we scrap it? 

 
-- 

Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen

LilyPond Software Design
 -- Code for Music Notation
http://www.lilypond-design.com



_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to