I'm currently removing all "see also" links to input/regression/*.ly
from the docs. These files will be categorized (or "directorized"),
placed in LSR, and will appear in the new "Snippets" infrastructure.
The relevant doc pages in the manual will point to the appropriate
directory.
Please don't add any @file{...regression...} links to the manual. If
you have an example that has useful info, please place it in the
input/tolsr/
directory. (ie put copies of the example in input/regression/ and
input/tolsr/ )
I'll be creating this dir soon (once I've done an initial clean-up of
the 48 current examples in there). Once the initial backlog is cleared
up, I'll process any new snippets ASAP. (if a developer wants to add
the snippets directly to LSR, that's quite welcome; I'm just offering
this in case you just want to dump your regtest there and move on to
other things)
Why this complication? IMO, input/regression/ should be for developers
only; it's too confusing for users to look for snippets in input/test/,
LSR, input/regression/ (looking at 48 useful examples in the midst of
468 developer-only tests), etc. The fact that we have any
@file{...regression...} links in the docs are a holdover from the Early
Days (tm).
Cheers,
- Graham
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
