Le mardi 13 février 2007 à 17:10 +0200, Till Rettig a écrit : > Hi John, > > so I also translated the sponsor/options.html to the German tree, well I > don't know, I hope I put the right commitment in the head: I got three > different depending if I said git-rev-parse HEAD oder HEAD^ or > web/master. I chose the later one, because that's how it is in the > README. What do the other two then represent?
"git-rev-parse HEAD" tells you the head committish of your current branch (myweb for example), which is different from the remote branch. "git-rev-parse HEAD^" tells you the committish of the head commit parent. You have well guessed the right command to use is in README. I'll fix these comments to avoid future confusion. > There was actually a typo > when I had already commited so it might be the second patch doesn't > apply cleanly... Applying one or a hundred patches is equally trivial as long as the patches succesion was made against the latest upstream branch. I've applied your patches, thanks. -- John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
