2007/8/27, Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello everybody, > > a few days ago, I posted a link to > http://lilypond.org/web/about/automated-engraving/benchmarking.html > which made me realize that the static pages visitors are most likely > to visit when then don't know LilyPond, are realized with very old > versions of Lily: 1.4, 1.8 -- the most recent being 2.1 in > http://lilypond.org/web/about/automated-engraving/schubert
I think that would be a good idea; However, the 1.4 output was intended as a "before" example, so it should not be replaced. > LilyPond has evolved a lot, and maybe the output is better now? Should > we consider updating the benchmarks page, or creating a new one (with > comparisons to recent Sibelius or Finale versions, for instance)? Or That would be a good idea. We get a lot of flak for comparing to an older version of Finale. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
