Good catch. Actually, we should rephrase the initial text (lines 1283 and 1284) to avoid naming a specific version, because convert-ly updates the \version in the example but not in the intro text. And that intro text is really awkward, anyway. I can't believe I wrote it.

Cheers,
- Graham

Till Rettig wrote:
Hi,

I think we should change the version number in the tutorial text for 2.11 from 2.10.1 also to 2.11.23 as done in the example.
It is in line 1284.
After all this manual is for 2.11.x isn't it?

Greetings
Till


_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel




_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to