Werner LEMBERG writes: > Can you please explain to me what is `involved'?
I translate involved as our historical need for bleeding edge versions, (sometimes even patched) of flex, ghostscript, guile, fontconfig etc. People who can cope with this usually have no problem compiling lilypond. The trouble starts when people do not succeed, often after unsuccessfully or partially updating their system with newer or conflicting versions. Thanks to Gub, it is often less work for us to bake a binary for them than to debug their system through an email client. This would not work for people who want to take part in development, but we expect those people to be able to cope. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
