On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 01:58:45 +0100 (CET) Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Indeed, the image in subsection `articulations and ornamentations' > lacks descriptions for the articulations, which should be added -- > until now noone has thought of this particular problem, so it's a good > thing if you report all such issues to the list because a big rewrite > of the documentation is done currently. Isn't this covered in the _List of articulations_ appendix B.8 ? > Here's the table; on the left side the short syntax, on the right side > the syntax form using articulation names. I suppose that we could add this back for the shorthands; IIRC, I removed the names since I didn't think they were useful. I mean, if you know what the desired shape looks like, you can see it in the picture. If you don't know what shape you want, then knowing that -- is \legato doesn't really help. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
