On 07/02/2008, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > 2008/2/7, Mats Bengtsson : > > Keeping the description at a cookbook level, as you propose, is one > > alternative.
Probably the worst one. :-) But a good conversation starter, I hope. > > Another alternative is to describe more clearly what the different > > parameters actually mean. That would be better. > - the myStaffSize was an attempt at explaining this. At least a good start. Without that I would have been completely lost. I changed that but because the scaling factor had the same value as the \myStaffSize I reasoned that I would have to change that too. Only when I read Eyolfs email I understood that the scaling factor 20 should be left untouched. At least some kind of explanation about the different values would be useful. > > Also, do we really need this silly scaling by 20 for the last parameter? > > Even better, couldn't we get rid of that parameters completely, and make a > > function that figures out the staff size setting in the current module? > > This is a good idea. Second that. The most convenient way for a normal user. -Risto _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
