On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 20:38:16 +0200 "Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...OR... (prepare to hit your head against the nearest wall) we could > simply stop using a mixed format such as lilypond-book, and write the > whole documentation using lilyPond; Nicolas' code we were just talking > about makes it possible, and it would be easy to \include the > examples, snippets etc. Umm. That joke didn't work. I trust I don't need to point out how ridiculous this idea is? > then we'd have only one big Documentation.ly file, that would get > automatically updated through convert-ly :-) Really? convert-ly changes material inside \markup strings? I highly doubt that... if it *does*, I'd consider that a bug. - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
