2008/4/7, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Could we get *all* the internals treated with lilypond-book ? > Currently the docs generated from define-markup-commands.scm are > processed with lilypond-book, but the docs generated from other > files (like define-grob-properties.scm) go directly to .texi. > > It would be nice to add lilypond examples for properties, and we > seem to have sufficient interest to begin this task.
I am not sure what the right technology would be. The quoting would get very hairy, because most of the internals are generated from .scm or .cc files. I think we should look into a way of having a directory Documentation/internal/grob-properties/PROPERTY-NAME.tely make it so that the internals documentation automatically uses that snippet for documenting said property. That would also provide a way to do documentations. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
