On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:24:12 +0200 "Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/4/24 Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Compromise: could makelsr.py ignore > > % GDB: ... > > lines? That way we could tag snippet authorship with > > % GDB: Thanks to Foo Bar for this snippet > > without cluttering up the official docs. > > Yes, but that way the author's name won't be displayed at all (even > the comment will be stripped out). Umm, yes. That is exactly the point. Look, we don't tag the .itely files with individual names. @c the next paragraph was written by Graham, edited by Trevor, @c and proofread by Francisco and Neil. ... @c the next paragraph was written by Trevor, approved by Graham, @c proofread by... We have a THANKS file for a reason -- adding attributions to every single contribution is unweildly. > I don't have any solution, but it's a pity that we always have to > print either the *whole* code verbatim or no code at all. Not a pity at all. We /want/ to show the whole file. With the exception of the automatic paper formatting stuff that lilypnod-book does for our manuals, we want to show people exactly what commands they should use to produce the file. > Could there be a way to implement a new command such as > @lilypond[fragment, quote, selectedVerbatim] > > This could be a valuable tool for documentation as well. Thoughts? Not worth the effort. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
