On 2008/04/26, Graham Percival wrote: > Could we get > [relative=x] > to automatically imply > [fragment] > ? I can't imagine any possible use of [relative] where you don't > want [fragment], and this would simplify the doc source by almost > entirely omitting [fragment].
Indeed, relative=x doesn't work without fragment, so getting relative to imply fragment is not really a simplification, it's even a bugfix :-) Done in Git. Best, John _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
