On Mon, 12 May 2008 09:13:27 +0100 "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote Sunday, May 11, 2008 10:44 PM > > I've commented it out; > > if/when somebody takes this section, they can decide whether to > > definitely delete it or not. > > The actual content needs to be retained (and perhaps expanded > and linked to a glossary item to explain what it is); but > the location that needs to be redetermined. At the risk of being as cheeky with you as I am with Valentin, what about NR 1.1.4 Shape note heads? ;) > > IMO, yes. (although in this specific case, it might be better to > > direct people to the keyboard section) > > Harps certainly have specialist notation but it is not > currently supported by LilyPond. In that case, it's IMO even more important to keep a specific Harp section -- we can mention these unsupported things. It also might prompt people to create those things, just like the bagpipe and accordion stuff (which AFAIK has no special code-features; they're all done with "extra" .ly files). Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
