2008/5/5 Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Am Sonntag, 4. Mai 2008 schrieb Trevor Daniels: > > Hi Reinhold > > > > These fix most of the problems: > > > > \override InstrumentSwitch #'outside-staff-priority = 100 > > \override InstrumentSwitch #'self-alignment-X = #LEFT > > > > but not the baseline alignment. > > ...and not the way too large padding between the staff and the instrument > name. But thanks for your hints, I could track down how bad the current > defaults for InstrumentSwitch are: > > -) no outsize-staff-priority => placed at fixed position > -) staff-padding set to 2, which means that the instrument name was placed > half a staff away! I suppose 0.5 would make much more sense (or maybe > somthing up t o1, but nothing larger than that! I find a spaff-padding of 1 > already too large.) > -) center-aligned on the note they apply to (=> unusable for longer names) > > > Attached is a patch, which changes the defaults for InstrumentSwitch to > more > sensible values: > -) outside-staff-priority set to 500 > -) staff-padding reduced to 0.5 > -) left-aligned on the note (actually, in the hand-engraved scores that I > have, most fo the cue instrument names are neither center-aligned nor > left-aligned on the note, but rather left aligned at the start of the > measure...) > > Okay to apply?
Please do, once you've incorporated Mats' suggestion to solve the spacing problem. Joe
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
