I trust that you've seen the previous discussion about this?
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-02/msg00688.html
I can't see anything in that discussion that you didn't cover below,
but I figured the link wouldn't hurt.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Tue, 20 May 2008 11:06:01 +0100
"Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm drafting a section for the Notation Reference which says:
>
> When adding articulations to notes the direction indicator,
> @code{^}, @code{_} or @code{-}, can usually be omitted, in which
> case @code{-} is assumed. But a direction indicator is
> @strong{always} required before
>
> @itemize
> @item @code{\tweak} commands and
> @item @code{\markup} commands.
> @end itemize
>
> Can someone please confirm that this is correct and that there
> are no more note articulations which _require_ a direction indicator.
>
> TIA
>
> Trevor
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
