2008/7/16 Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Neil,
>
> Why did you modify the \paper{} and \layout{} settings for the
> headwords?If you remember, I said I thought some of the headwords would look better without ragged-right = ##t; it only works if the recommended line-width (16 cm) is used. > - the \layout settings are necessary to avoid text going into the > margins; they were taken directly from LM x.y.z Avoiding tweaks > with slower processing. The keyboard headword did have text in the margins, but that was only because it was ragged. > - why remove the key signature and enable proportional notation in > the rhythm example? That might be appropriate if this were some > 20th century piece, but this is pure Beethoven. You mean the time signature? It's a personal thing, and I apologize for not running it past you first, but it seems silly to have a time signature present when the excerpt doesn't start at the beginning. I didn't enable propotional notation; it's Trevor's tweak to improve the spacing. > - I'd like all headwords to use the same settings. If you think > that 16cm is better than 17cm (maybe the pdf looks bad with > 17cm; I can't remember if I checked), then please change it for > *all* headwords. 16cm is a prerequisite for pdf if ragged-right = ##f, otherwise some of the snippets run off the right hand side. > > I'm quite willing to have you change any things in the headwords, > but I'm not certain if you've considered all these issues. Well, I didn't blindly change things without checking both the html and pdf output first. Regards, Neil _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
