On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Carl Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I apologize for this mistake. I discovered it and removed the @qq{} in my
> local docs; I didn't think I had pushed that patch. I'm sorry. I'll try to
> avoid
> this problem in the future.
No problem.
> I think @qq{} is the appropriate use here; it's used to identify a Scheme
> string. I'm glad that some patch is being prepared.
Ah, okay. It's the first time @qq{} has been used in an internals
doc-string, so I wasn't sure what to think. :-)
> I'm not knowledgeable on this, but it seems to me that Reinhold's
> patch is better.,
Yes, and he also cleaned up the file a bit more.
-Patrick
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
