I am fine with dropping this code.

On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Carl D. Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In responding to Trevor Daniels's review of NR 2.7 Chords, I came across the
> fact that the Banter chord naming code is broken -- it will not produce
> output for a simple c chord.

> Second question:  Does anybody care that Banter chord naming doesn't work?


-- 
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen


_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to