On 8/18/08 4:19 PM, "Reinhold Kainhofer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am Montag, 18. August 2008 schrieb Valentin Villenave:
>> I've noticed you "tagged" this new markup command as "music"; although
>> I'm fine with it, I wonder if there would be a proper way to regroup
>> all fret-diagrams and harp-pedal-diagrams in a same category of the
>> docs (that could be named, I don't know, "Specific diagram
>> notations"?)
>
> I was wondering about this, too, but I didn't want to touch fret diagram code,
> too.
>
> How about "Instrument-specific notation", using "instrument"as category?
I like "instrument" as the category.
I'm not sure I like "Instrument-specific notation", as notation is too
large, at least as I think about the anticipated uses of these markups.
Maybe "Instrument-specific markups", since we are talking about an appendix
of all defined markups?
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
