On 8/18/08 2:01 PM, "John Mandereau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>> I think it would also be easier to have a separate branch for the docs
>> because it would facilitate debugging -- there are lots more docs commits
>> than code commits, so it's hard (for me at least) to do a good job of
>> bisecting when I'm looking for code changes.  If we can come up with some
>> method for isolating doc changes from code changes, I think it would be
>> helpful.
>
> As we finally should merge hypothetical documentation and code
> branches, all commits would be in the final branch anyway.  Han-Wen
> gave you a tip for isolating commits by directory, so this not a
> problem.
>

I agree.  I withdraw my suggestion.

Thanks for the help.

Carl




_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to