2008/9/4 Yves Guillemot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > I finished your translation for you while you were away. I hope it isn't > > total gibberish. :) > No, it's very good. > "Ajouter suffixes" should be better than "Annexer suffixes", but it doesn't > matter so much. > > I wonder how I should have translated "Interpret chord texts as lead sheet > chord names". I have some difficulties to understand this sentence. Isn't > the > notation editor window a lead sheet as soon as some chord names are > displayed ? > > Or maybe I completely missed something ? > I just tried with two chord names. When the box is checked, there is no > chord > names in lilypond preview and the chord names are displayed when the box is > unchecked. Should not it be the opposite ? >
The chord names should be in LilyPond syntax, i.e., not "Am" but "a:m". If the syntax is incorrect the chord is just not displayed. I could have done also mappings "Am" to "a:m", "B" to "b", "C7" to "c:7", but I did not want to invent a new syntax for the seventh and ninth chords. Best wishes, Heikki
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
