We already have the predefined macro \noBeam. Do we really need yet another
more or less obscure special case of the syntax?
/Mats
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
I'm not sure whether this has been discussed before: What do you think
of using `c[]' as a shorthand for `\autoBeamOff c \autoBeamOn'?
Currently, `c[]' produces
_____
|
|
O
(a note with a beamlet to the left and right), which is neither
documented nor makes much sense IMHO.
My special example is this where such a shorthand would be quite
convenient:
c4 c c \times 2/3 { r8 c16 } c8
(see attached image).
Werner
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
--
=============================================
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
School of Electrical Engineering
Royal Institute of Technology (KTH)
SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=============================================
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
