2008/9/19 Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> "Francisco Vila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> BTW It surely would be better to include the content only, without
>> the @node commands, and keep the @node in the file so that
>> menus-update does its work and does not break the file.
>
> If that's possible, go ahead.
These included nodes are mentioned in scm/documentation-generate.scm :
(call-with-output-file "markup-commands.tely"
(lambda (port)
(dump-node (markup-doc-node) port 2)))
(call-with-output-file "markup-list-commands.tely"
(lambda (port)
(dump-node (markup-list-doc-node) port 2)))
I cannot change dump-node to anything else, so I think that the @node
will remain there forever (and out from the file that includes this),
I'll go ahead with the warning sign.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
http://www.paconet.org
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
