Valentin
Thanks for this. I'm happy with the reorganisation in general. As there is
only one vocal "instrument" the standard layout for NR 2 does not apply
here, so dropping the Common notation ... section is fine.
There will not be many References for vocal music, as pretty well all of it
is going to be in this section, but there should be one to
@rlearning{Songs}, which gives a gentle introduction to some of the easier
concepts. Maybe this should be near the top, rather than buried in section
2.1.1.4. Could the References be moved up? And it certainly must not be
removed! Apart from the reference mentioned it should contain at least refs
to the templates.
On formatting, please use @unnumberedsubsubsec rather than @subsubsection.
This avoids the ugly four-element numbers and gives a better layout in html.
I'm not familiar with the suggested headword. Let's put it up and have a
look.
I've not pushed this, as I know nothing of translations, but I'm happy to do
so if John says it's OK.
Trevor
----- Original Message -----
From: "Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Lily-Devel List" <[email protected]>; "John Mandereau"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Francisco Vila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 8:23 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Vocal music
2008/9/30 Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
It's all yours! Forget the opera - have some light relief!
Thanks -- although working on "vocal music" is not as exotic as I'd like
:-)
OK, here's a first patch. John, Francisco, please have a look before
pushing; as explained in the commit's description, it might get you
nervous. I have carefully updated the translations, but not the po
files.
Cheers,
Valentin
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
