> > BTW, it's possible (and it happens often in reality) that a slur
> > ending and starting point is on the same note:
> >
> >    c( d)( e)
>
> Not that I like the idea, or anything, but wouldn't the proposed
> syntax just be (c (d) e)?

I just want to emphasize that the concept of `grouping' doesn't fit
well to slurs.  Your syntax `example' shows exactly that :-)


    Werner


_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to