Dear Han-Wen, > John Zaitseff wrote: > > > > I´m not saying it´s too difficult; I´m saying I won´t apply > > > your patch :-) > > > > Not trying to be difficult, but given that this idea (of tempo > > ranges) seems to me to be a reasonable one, is there any reason > > why not? I realise that it is a syntax change; is that reason > > enough? >
> I think it is a feature that will only benefit few users, and does > not warrant an extension of the parser. Changing the syntax is > problematic because it may in the future prevent us from doing > other changes. Well, that's fair enough. > What is the problem with using a music function? Nothing really, except that it would have been nice to have the syntactic sugar of "\tempo 4. = 92-96" as I suggested. Yours truly, John Zaitseff -- John Zaitseff ,--_|\ The ZAP Group Phone: +61 2 9643 7737 / \ Sydney, Australia E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] \_,--._* http://www.zap.org.au/ v _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
