2008/11/8 Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 9:10 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> http://codereview.appspot.com/7261/diff/1/2 >>> File lily/context-def.cc (right): >>> >>> http://codereview.appspot.com/7261/diff/1/2#newcode215 >>> Line 215: seen = new set<const Context_def *> (); >>> Can you make a wrapper function that does >>> >>> set<..> seen; >>> path_to (.. , &seen) >>> >>> instead? >> >> I've tried, but I'm completely stumped. :) >> >> I barely understand how this works, so I'm a bit out of my depth >> unfortunately. >> >> Are you suggesting a recursive call? > > No, this call is already recursive; I suggest creating another > function which allocates the set<> and does the outer call of the > recursive function. >
A new patch set is up with regtest and convert-ly rule. Cheers, Neil _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
