On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 07:14:34PM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > a long time ago, if I remember correctly, there was a difference > between lilypond-book's handling of \lilypond and a `lilypond' > environment: The former was (mainly) for inline use, the latter > (mainly) for use in a paragraph of its own.
How was \lilypondfile handled? IMO, \lilypondfile and \lilypond should have the same behavior, but it doesn't make sense for \lilypondfile to be for inline use. What about somethine like \inlinelilypond instead? This would also avoid the compatibility problem. Other than this nitpick, I love the suggestion -- I've occasionally wanted to include notation inline, but since it never worked I always ended up rewording my paragraphs so it wasn't necessary. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
