"Anthony W. Youngman" <[email protected]> writes:
> In message <[email protected]>, David Kastrup > <[email protected]> writes >> >>Hi, >> >>the ambitus engraver seemingly picks the first maximum/minimum in the >>note sequence and stays with it even when the same absolute pitch comes >>up later with a better match to the ambitus engraver's key signature. >> >>Here is a real world example where the ambitus engraver (which is >>working in C major) picks c flat rather than b as its lowest span. >>Ugly. > > Not that I use ambituses, but surely, where there multiple notes of > the same pitch (I hate to say "absolute pitch", because to take the > above example c-flat and b-natural are NOT the same pitch except on > the piano), Ambitus engravings are for expressing physical limits. I can't think of a tuning/instrument where enharmonic relations could make a difference. > it makes sense to take the lowest (or highest, as appropriate) note - > b over c. No. The ambitus should definitely orient itself with its key signature: it makes no sense using accidentals when a natural pitch is there. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
