On wo, 2009-02-18 at 11:48 +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
> After a successful bootstraping stage, I tried "make -f lilypond.make"
> and "make -f lilypond.make installers"; both failed with the attached log.
Weird. Dependencies seem to be failing utterly. But how? Han-Wen,
any great ideas?
> In bootstraping, Flex and Guile are built for target "tools", which I
> find strange, whereas they are not built for each target platform. I
> also miss Python building. What are the recommended commands to build
> these three depencdencies before attempting at building Lily binaries?
You did what is recommended. bin/gub however tells you exactly what
it is going to do in its 'must rebuild' line, eg
$ LIBRESTRICT=open:stat nice bin/gub --keep mingw::lilypond
calculating dependencies
must rebuild[mingw]: glib pango pthreads-w32 python urw-fonts lilypad
tools::icoutils linux-x86::cross/binutils linux-x86::cross/gcc-core
linux-x86::glibc-core linux-x86::cross/gcc linux-x86::glibc tools::scons
tools::nsis lilypond
[..]
the target that librestrict gets is [PLATFORM::]lilypond, which is
exactly what lilypond.make will do.
If you need, you can look-up the dependencies in gub/specs/lilypond.py:
_get_build_dependencies (), and see what's installed already by doing
bin/gpkg -p mingw list
Hmm, come to think of it, you had *another* problem with dependencies,
the librestrict-open thing...
How hard is it for you to install another python and try that?
Does fedora carry python2.4 or python2.6 (or even python3) packages
that you can install alongside your 2.5.1, for example.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
