2009/3/4 Carl D. Sorensen <[email protected]>: > > > > On 3/3/09 11:40 AM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> http://codereview.appspot.com/24044/diff/1/2#newcode8 >> Line 8: \version "2.13.0" >> "2.13.1" > > The current value of VERSION is 2.13.0, and there is no 2.13.0 available for > download on the website. I assumed, therefore, that the test 2.13.0 that > was released but had crashing problems didn't constitute an official 2.13.0 > release.
Hmm, that's a possiblity, though it could be that 2.13.0 is waiting for somebody to update the website. > Current git version is 2.13.0. If these files are to be 2.13.1, they won't > run without a warning on the git build. > > So, which do I do, 2.13.0 or 2.13.1? And if it is 2.13.1, should I bump > VERSION? It won't do any harm to leave it at 2.13.0 since we can always change it later. A version bump would be necessary for 2.13.1. >> http://codereview.appspot.com/24044/diff/1/6#newcode24 >> Line 24: \consists "Separating_line_group_engraver" >> Instrument_name_engraver? > > I removed it because I have never seen an Instrument Name associated with a > fret diagram line, but I can put it back if desired. I'm not that bothered, but I noticed there's an instrument name set in one of the FretBoard regtests. Regards, Neil _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
