"Carl D. Sorensen" <[email protected]> writes: > On 3/13/09 4:51 AM, "David Kastrup" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> It might be nice if some developers made it into a habit to try >> building from a freshly checked out tree from time to time without >> reverting to their secret knowledge. > > Is it really necessary to get nasty?
If you call that getting nasty, we likely have different standards. But that is not overly important: I actually am not as much interested in necessary, but rather in sufficient conditions. What would you propose as a sufficient measure for getting the complete info documentation into a shape where it has reasonably chance of being picked up by end users and distribution maintainers? What kind of reaction from somebody who does not have the resources to become a sophisticated developer (which would likely make me unsuitable for reporting the end user view anyway) would you prefer? Could you spell it out? I am sort of dense. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
