On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 12:49:48PM +0100, John Mandereau wrote: > Graham Percival a écrit : >> I'm not clear about this, either. Actually, if anything >> introduction.itely is going to die entirely (as part of the >> web-gop stuff). >> > All right. I can't work on GOP in the 4 coming weeks: I must work on > translaed documentation compilation by translating > node names in source files because the current system has too many bugs; > this alone is already a big task.
No problem; I'm probably not going to be doing much until April 17, anyway. > And I'm still playing with GUB3 (trying to build it with Python 3 now...). That would be nice. :) >> compile.itely is slated to be removed from AU 1, so in the long >> term I think it should be moved to devel/. However, in the short >> term I really can't spend the effort requried to make everything >> work, so I recommend waiting 1 or 2 months. >> > OK, in the meantime we at least don't have to worry about compilation > instructions duplicated in the sources. True. > Do you like the idea of separating compilation instructions for > self-builders and packagers (that must go > in INSTALL too) from instructions for Lily developers? Sure, but those would be sections within the install chapter. I'd actually split up the "self-buliders" and "packagers" categories, though. I'm going to tentatively estimate late June for working on this stuff, though. :) Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
