On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 06:55 -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Hello, > > Thanks to Carl's patient help, I've successfully submitted my first > patch as a Frog! > <insert sound of trumpets, throw confetti, etc.> > > 1. For my next task, I was thinking of fixing the polyphonic > shorthand. Unfortunately, searching the tree for > << > gives a couple of thousand hits... ;-) > Any hints on where that shorthand is defined would be greatly > appreciated.
In parser.yy, on line 990. It might be more useful, though, to leave the parser alone and work with the scheme representation (the one you get with \displayMusic). The parser generates this by calling scheme functions from scm/ly-syntax-constructors.scm. > 2. Can Hairpin inherit line-spanner-interface? If so, can this be > done in Scheme, or does it require C++? You can "add" the line-spanner-interface by modifying scm/define-grobs.scm. This doesn't really achieve anything except to tell lilypond that it should expect users to do \override Hairpin #'some-property-in-line-spanner-interface = #foo In order to get the functionality of the properties in line-spanner-interface, every one of them needs to be implemented in the callbacks that Hairpin uses. For example, the default value of Hairpin's 'stencil is ly:hairpin::print (defined in hairpin.cc), which doesn't honor left-bound-info. So yes, some C++ hacking would be required. HTH, Joe _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
