>> I don't think so. AFAIK, we want *exactly* the URW versions, so
>> this looks like a good alternative.
>
> Do we really want to use these particular clones in case there are
> supposedly metrically identical fonts installed in a preferred
> setting?
IMHO yes. Those fonts are intended as fallback fonts; the user is
free to override them with something different.
> If for some reason, only the URW version of those fonts is
> acceptable, the foundry=urw variant obviously is the way to go.
I would it formulate differently: The URW fonts are free, they fit
exactly our purposes, it doesn't hurt to install them, so make
lilypond depend on them unconditionally.
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
