OK - there is a weakness in the description that it skips all of the formatting work, which is the more complex and more flexible part of lily actually. This is because Erik's subject only dealt with the frontend part of lilypond, and did not modify the backend at all.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Carl D. Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> wrote: > I've added a brief description of the LilyPond Architecture (for want of a > better word -- suggestions welcome) to the Contributor's guide. It's based > on what I read in Erik Sandberg's thesis. > > I think it's correct, but I'm not positive. Could I have those of you who > understand things better than me review the material and make corrections or > suggestions? > > The explanation in question is at > > <http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/devel/contrib-guide/Overview-o > f-LilyPond-architecture.html#Overview-of-LilyPond-architecture> > > (Section 7.1 of the CG on kainhofer) > > > Thanks, > > Carl > > > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-devel mailing list > lilypond-devel@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel > -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
