On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 04:53:55PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Mittwoch, 29. April 2009 15:57:18 Valentin Villenave wrote: > > 2009/4/29 Graham Percival <[email protected]>: > > > > 2009/4/29 Graham Percival <[email protected]>: > > > Yes and no. It would be a great strategy, if we had any clue what > > > the status of LSR was. Until we have some kind of indication as > > > to when the change can happen, and how it should happen, I > > > question whether any of this work is worthwhile. > > > Valentin, what's the latest? > > > > No news from Seba. Of course, we may install a temporary LSR on my > > server (or Reinhold's).
Then it's time to bug him again. > When the LSR had stability problems a while ago, I tried setting up the LSR > on > my server, but I couldn't get the java stuff to work (the kubuntu packages > don't seem to install all the jars in a directory that is automatically > available in the classpath, and back then I couldn't give a directory in the > class path, only individual jars, so the classpath would be several thousand > characters long...). Well, other distros might have better java packing, or a dedicated java person might be able to fix it, or maybe the LSR source tarball is out of date... there's a ton of reasons why this could be failing. If anybody wants to take this on -- and I'm really not looking at you for this Reinhold; you do enough already -- then that'd be awesome. If not, then we just have to wait for Sebastiano. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
