On 5/22/09 7:25 AM, "Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> By the way, who's offering to spend the 5-20 hours required to >> implement such changes to the parser? (whatever we end up >> deciding) >> > And also in the LilyPondTool parser? ;) > Bert, As mucn as I like LilyPondTool, it seems to me that we can't refuse to make changes to LilyPond just because it would require changes to LilyPondTool. Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Re: Using .ily for included lil... Francisco Vila
- Re: Using .ily for included... David Kastrup
- Re: Using .ily for inc... David Kastrup
- Re: Using .ily for included lil... Graham Percival
- Re: Using .ily for included... Valentin Villenave
- Re: Using .ily for inc... Francisco Vila
- Re: Using .ily for inc... Graham Percival
- Re: Using .ily for... Valentin Villenave
- Re: Using .ily for... Graham Percival
- Re: Using .ily for... Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)
- Re: Using .ily for... Carl D. Sorensen
- Re: Using .ily for... Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)
- Re: Using .ily for included lilypond files Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)
- Re: Using .ily for included lilypond fi... Jonathan Kulp
- Re: Using .ily for included lilypond fi... Graham Percival
- Re: Using .ily for included lilypon... Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)
- Re: Using .ily for included lilypond files Neil Puttock
- Re: Using .ily for included lilypond fi... Graham Percival
