On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 08:16:10PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote: > On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Graham > Percival<[email protected]> wrote: > > web/ (new repo) > > I think this should be called "lilypond-web" if it's in a separate > repo. Or else it won't be obvious what "web" refers to.
Well, this would be a sub-repo below the main "lilypond" one, but I have no objection to calling it "lilypond-web" anyway. Should we do a similar thing with "lilypond-gub", then? > I think it makes sense to have "macos-lilypad" separate from GUB, > since it *is* a separate application. IMO, it should be named > "lilypad" or "lilypond-lilypad". Maybe the Windows Lilypad should be > integrated into the same code tree too? That would be nice, but I have no clue where the windows lilypad code is. Until/unless they get merged, I favor keeping "macos" in the name, since it *is* specifically for osx. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
