On 6/24/09 12:09 PM, "Hans Aberg" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 24 Jun 2009, at 15:47, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>
>> About 10 weeks ago I proposed a new architecture for autobeaming
>> rules,
>> which placed all the rules in a single nested alist, with one entry
>> per time
>> signature.
>
> To me that sounds as though the time signature selects the meter,
> which barely works in CPP. For more complex meters, one in effect does
> the other way around: one selects a meter, and then sums it up fully
> to to some degree to get the time signature.
I'm not sure I understand all of your points. With the new changes, it is
possible to define any grouping you want to define within a time signature.
Thus, if you want to have 2/8 + 3/8 +2 8 = 7/8, it is trivial to get (2 3 2)
grouping from a 7/8 time signature.
>
> If that is not within the scope of the current changes, then so it may
> be. But the current model is a bit too complicated.
By current, do you mean LilyPond 2.12? If so, I agree. That's why I'm
working on changes.
Thanks,
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
