On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Mark Polesky<[email protected]> wrote: > > 0) scheme-function "ly:in-event-class?" is define-public'd in > define-event-classes.scm but never called. Do we add it to > the list in IR 4 Scheme Functions or remove it altogether?
All of the IR 4 functions are auto-generated from C++ code (search for LY_DEFINE in the source). Maybe someday we will be able to have auto-generated docs for all "define-public" Scheme functions; in that case, I think this function would be useful, so we should keep it "define-public". > 1) scheme-functions "dispatcher" and "listener" are in the list > in IR 4 Scheme Functions, but should they be renamed > "ly:dispatcher?" and "ly:listener?" I wrote a patch for this a while back, and Carl suggested I write a convert-ly rule for it (which I haven't done yet). See this thread: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2008-12/msg00715.html If you would like to write a convert-ly and send a combined patch, I am okay with that. Thanks, Patrick _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
