On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 5:16 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen<janneke-l...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > Hmm, I read a bit more in that thread. It looks to me as if > > 1 there is a basic consensus amongst the core developers > that a move to GPL v3 (not sure about GPL v3 or later) > is desirable > > 2a Han-Wen even has done quite a bit of initial paperwork > > 2b no-one has offered to do the work of tracking down and > get permissions/paper work for the remaining authors > > 2c Han-Wen is not easily inspired to do silly admin stuff > esp. sot so when attempted to muscle him into it with > "do what I tell you" disguised in invalid > thou-must-bow-for-the-almighty-GNU arguments :-) > > 3 there is a possibility of transferring copyright to > the FSF [or another governing entity], which could > have a simplifying/catalizing effect on 1 and/or 2
4. There is no disaster if we leave it GPL v2 as it is. I am sure that there are more interesting bugs in our tracker that need to be dealt with more urgently. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
