On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 03:37:06PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote: > On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 03:08:50PM -0700, Graham Percival wrote: > > I don't see a huge urgency for this patch, so I would rather wait > > until b) was non-existent. I totally agree that we should split > > a) and c), though. > > I think there is a slight confusion about what my patch implements. > > The new option, -dwarning-as-error, does *not* turn every warning into > an error. It only turns specific warnings (that don't exist without > this patch) into errors.
Oh! Yes, I was definitely confused. (that said, I _do_ like the notion of a "complete" -dwarning-as-error, for regtests, *if* we can check them all) OTOH, since you only want to warning-error-check certain files, why not make -dwarning-as-error as I misunderstood, then enable it in those specific svg-related regtests? We can work towards adding it as a general makefile rule later. I'm not certain if a -dsvg-warning-as-error patch is particularly useful, even for the regtests. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
