Are these two patches okay to apply? I have a question about the second one.
Starting on line 845 in define-grob-properties.scm, there is a group
labeled "grobs & grob arrays", and of the 60 or so properties there, all
of them have type ly:grob or ly:grob-array, except the following nine.
Should these nine properties be moved to the section labeled "other"
starting on line 951?
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;; grobs & grob arrays. (alphabetical)
(accidental-grobs ,list? "An alist with @code{(@var{notename} .
@var{groblist})} entries.")
(adjacent-pure-heights ,pair? "A pair of vectors. Used by a
@code{VerticalAxisGroup} to cache the @code{Y-extent}s of different column
ranges.")
(bar-extent ,number-pair? "The Y-extent of the actual bar line.
This may differ from @code{Y-extent} because it does not include the dots in
a repeat bar line.")
(cross-staff ,boolean? "For a beam or a stem, this is true if we
depend on inter-staff spacing.")
(forced ,boolean? "Manually forced accidental.")
(glyph-name ,string? "The glyph name within the font.")
(important-column-ranks ,vector? "A cache of columns that contain
@code{items-worth-living} data.")
(note-columns ,pair? "A list of @code{NoteColumn} grobs.")
(pure-Y-offset-in-progress ,boolean? "A debugging aid for catching
cyclic dependencies.")
Thanks.
- Mark
0001-define-context-properties.scm-Sort-translation-prope.patch
Description: Binary data
0002-define-grob-properties.scm-Sort-user-and-internal-gr.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
